I must confess that at first sympathized with Paul on many issues especially when it is apologetic Santomauro against Mario Olcese, Socinians apologist. Then when I found I lashed the SDA, I was curious to read his writings. I killed interesting, but ultimately disappointed me. It's that simple. Total disappointment.
reason?: Arguments simple verses out of context and little knowledge of who are its subject matter.
However, further disappointment, I found this video on youtube and I really became sad disappointment.
analyzing the video
1. The famed evangelical apologist says: "The Bible teaches that Christians should keep the Sabbath as a day of rest."
Answer: Mr. Pablo Santomauro, if the Bible teaches that we must keep the Sabbath as a day of rest, then what day it teaches that we should keep? Mark 2:27 says: "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath." The Greek word for man is anthropos and often indicates humanity. So there clearly says that the Sabbath was made not only for Jews, Adventists, but to all humanity. Adam and Eve were Jews? No, they were the genesis of humanity. Saturday was for them too, as it was for Moses, Jesus and the disciples.
2. Santomauro said: "Nowhere in the Bible says that the Sabbath should be on a Saturday ... the Bible does not put names to the days of the week".
Answer: It is true that in the Hebrew Bible the weekdays have no names. That happens with the first six days. Well, to name only the Bible says, first day, second day ... etc (not their own name as Sunday or Monday).
example of this is that in Hebrew is the word "yom " which had significantly "day" but not so when we got to the seventh or Sabbath. In this case the biblical Hebrew does have a name for this day and the word "Sabbath" means rest and is the nomination of the seventh day.
Is this the reason why the King James version United Bible Societies, 1960 placed an asterisk every time there is the word "Sabbath" to a footnote that says "here is equivalent to Saturday" and from version Reina Valera 1995 directly translate the phrase "day of rest" as "Saturday" is a better translation, it is the name of the seventh day in the Bible because of its close correlation with the rest.
Clearly Pablo Santomauro demonstrates a poor knowledge but nothing, or of the Hebrew language because he said something completely out of place.
Any philologist, translator and theologian with knowledge of biblical languages \u200b\u200bwould argue otherwise.
good or if not go to see in the various translations of the Bible, how is that many do not use the phrase "Sabbath" but directly "Saturday" (see eg Vulagata America, New International Version, RV 1990, New English Bible, the Jerusalem Bible, the Bible of gold Torres Amat, etc., not counting the English translations that speak of self-Saturday-name in their respective language as NKJ 2000).
Well actually this plane will definitely remove all authority to the man who shows not know much about these matters.
3. The apologist says, "When the Bible rest on Saturday, does not refer to the Saturday of our calendar ... The Bible says we should work six days and the seventh we rest ...".
Answer: So the Sunday? Amuses me. I imagine Jesus resting a Wednesday. For Paul, the Apostle resting on a Thursday. And when I ask questions about the Sabbath says: No matter the day, but the intent. ;
is that this is the problem of evangelicals generally do not understand the theology of the Sabbath. The Sabbath is not a day of worship, is a day that you recognize that YOU ARE AND GOD CREATED MAN IS GOD THE CREATOR. If Jesus had wanted to give this teaching had not expected to be born Santomauro to say that any day could be the day of rest. Jesus kept the Sabbath, the day of rest .
4. Pablito says: "in the same way, when the Bible says that Jesus rose the third day does not mean that Jesus was resurrected on Wednesday."
Answer: Of course it apologist, I have answered itself. If the Bible says Jesus rose the third day, does not mean that Jesus was resurrected Wednesday. Simple. Can not be Wednesday, it is Sunday. It's that simple. can not change a day already established. If the Bible says the Sabbath is the Sabbath, can not be on Sunday or Monday. It is a day of rest, the sabbath.
5. Santomauro states: "The Bible does not require a day of rest. For example, Colossians ...".
Rest: Do not know why why not say you chapter and verse, but certainly Colossians 2:14-17, you do it only for once again show your lack of biblical knowledge and express your poor theological understanding. You should study and understand this text in context and not see at first glance and interpret because commit blunders.
Verse 17 is vital to understand what Paul, the apostle's meaning in these verses. Then write Colossians 2:16 and 17 taking into account that you have read the above verses also:
(LBA): "(Verse 16): So no one becomes a judge regarding your food or drink, or regarding holiday, or a new moon or Sabbath (verse 17): Things are a shadow of what is to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. "
course is that things that Paul mentions in verse 16 (meals, drinks, holidays, new moons and Saturdays there is to see what "Saturday" refers-) are a shadow of Christ. However here does not refer to the weekly Sabbath or seventh day of the week because he never had to function as the "shadow" or illustration of what Christ would come to realize, because it was "sanctified" by God (Gen. 2:2, 3 which uses the Hebrew verb "sanctify qodesh -which means" set apart for sacred use) from the building when there was no sin (and therefore was not necessary even death of Jesus).
Therefore "Saturday" or "days of rest" that Paul mentioned here should be those that biblically point to Jesus and not on Saturday week.
And what are these "Saturday" that pointed to Jesus or were left? : They were referred to the ceremonial Sabbaths in Leviticus 23:4-44. For example, in Leviticus 23:24 the day known as the "Day of Trumpets" (1st day of 7th month) it was called Saturday in Hebrew because nobody worked and was a Jewish holiday that Christians no longer needed to watch. Nine days later came another "Saturday" ceremonial: the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 23: 27-32). Five days after the day of atonement came the Feast of Tabernacles known where 15 and 22 of the seventh month were considered ceremonial sabbaths (Leviticus 23:39), not falling on the seventh day of the week (because there always fell in the seventh day of the week) but because they were days when not worked.
If you look carefully you will notice this passage in Colossians that Paul refers to this Saturday, not Saturday week, as well if referred to these, new moons, foods or drinks have nothing to do with the Ten Commandments out of position then it would be Paul's statement.
6. The apologist says, "But in reality, does not matter to God how we have our days ... God does not look if we worship God on Sunday morning, Saturday night or Tuesday ...". midday
Answer: From time here God has his spokesman, read the mind of God, says God does not care. When you say that? "Where does it say that? The cherry on top of surprises lie and simple arguments is that you argue that there is finally a day of rest, but half a day, fourth ... etc.
Disappointment total.
7. Santomauro says: "Always when we live faithful to God"
Answer: What is the true living God? I think that everything you say, do not know it manifest loyalty to leagues that fidelity is to follow your own interests and not the will of God.
Heyssen J. D Lamb Maraví
0 comments:
Post a Comment